Robert Brook runs a blog called The Broken Record, with a subtitle explaining that his blog is:
A GUIDE FOR THE DEDICATED ANALOG AUDIOPHILE
My Two Cents
I made a couple of quick notes and sent them by email to Robert, as follows:
- One record is not enough for this test, or any other for that matter, and
- Tests need to be blinded.
Without blinding all you are doing is confirming your prejudices, which is something you correctly point out in your piece, and no matter how much you want to think you aren’t doing that because you are trying so hard to guard against it, it is almost surely what you will end up doing.
Confirmation bias is at the heart of most mistaken audio judgments, something I learned a very long time ago, and only after making every kind of mistake there is to make, over the course of decades no less. Only one thing had the power to set me on the right path, and without it I would never have learned how to make any real progress in audio, or find better sounding records for that matter.
If you don’t know how to run good experiments, how can you be sure your results are of any value?
I discussed testing in a previous post of Robert’s: Why Does “Why” Matter in Analog?
Someone mentioned a blindfold test, and I was glad to hear it as blind testing is something I have been recommending for years.
I did a shootout for the 45 RPM pressings of Rumours in front of a world famous record collector, and it was obvious to me, if not to everyone, that none of the three copies sounded exactly the same as the others, yet they were brand new and pressed on audiophile vinyl in limited numbers.











