How to Become a Better Listener
UPDATE 2026
We wrote this commentary a couple of years back and now, having played some of the Tone Poets pressings we thought would have bad sound, have updated it with all the latest information on that sorry label.
Credibility is at the heart of our many disagreements with the online audiophile community, so we felt we needed to offer a way for audiophiles to do a better job of giving some context to their opinions.
When we run experiments that include modern remastered Heavy Vinyl records, comparing them to the vintage vinyl pressings we have on hand for our shootouts, the one thing we can say about them is that they are almost certain to be inferior. (Well, almost, but not quite.)
Some are a great deal worse than others, to be sure, but they are all inferior to one degree or another.
On another blog we were taken to task — by those who felt their systems were more than adequate to judge the sound quality of the real Blue Notes compared to the new releases — for predicting that Joe Harley’s Tone Poets releases, once we finally got around to playing them, would be just as awful as all the other records he has had a hand in producing
For the thirty years since these Heavy Vinyl pressings have come along, it has seemed to us that all the evidence pointed in the same direction — namely that audiophile systems are rarely capable of showing their owners the strengths and weaknesses of the records they play.
We discussed that very issue here in some depth. Curiously, the audiophile systems of reviewers has seemed to fail them every bit as badly.
If you, speaking as an audiophile, want to make the case for the superior quality of the records put out on the Tone Poets label, we are happy to entertain the possibility. Having played Heavy Vinyl pressings by the hundreds over the past three decades, the chances of their records having sound we would find acceptable are vanishingly small, but we can’t say the chances are zero.
Repeating the tiresome truism (aren’t they all?) that because reviews are subjective, your review is as credible as any other, simply will not do.
When we wrote the above we had yet to play a Tone Poets reissue in one of our shootouts. (We’d dropped the needle on a couple, but to get deep into the sound we really needed to do a shootout with a good-sized pile of cleaned Blue Note pressings, with special emphasis on those mastered by RVG. They’re the ones that most often win shootouts.)
We actively started to search out real Blue Note pressings, on various labels from various eras, for a couple of titles. After about two years we were able to do the shootouts and report our findings.
UPDATE 2025
We have now played a couple of the Tone Poets releases, for two of the very best sounding Blue Note recordings we’ve had the pleasure to play: Dexter Gordon’s One Flight Up and Lee Morgan’s Cornbread.
To read our reviews, click on the respective links for either or both of them: One Flight Up and Cornbread.
Having gone through all of this, the idea occurred to us that, more than anything else, what is common to the defenses offered by the fans of these new pressings is any semblance of credibility. Below we offer a solution to that problem.
Back Up Your Claims
If you want your claims to be taken seriously, by us or anybody else, you should consider providing some context for them. Here are some of the things we and no doubt others would like to know.
- Tell us about your system, room, electricity, etc. What do you feel are your system’s strengths and weaknesses?
- Tell us what specific pressings you compared.
- Tell us if you cleaned them, and if so, by what method.
- Tell us what protocols you used to make sure the comparison was a fair one.
- Tell us how you optimized the playback for each pressing, accounting for the difference in vinyl thickness, playback levels and the like.
- Tell us what specifically you were listening for.
- Tell us what tracks you played and what about those tracks made them good for testing.
- Tell us in as much detail as possible the specific strengths and weaknesses of each of the pressings. The best way to do that is to take notes that look like the ones we take on 4×6 post-its. Take a photo of your notes and send them along.
Got all that? OK. Please do your best to answer all eight questions and send them to tom@better-records.com.
Let’s Be Honest
You are never going to tell us all of these things, because you are never going to do what would be required of you to carry out this kind of serious testing.
Instead, you are more than likely going to assert that since your opinion is every bit as good as any other — opinions being opinions, not facts — no effort of the kind described above is required.
What Is Required
But it is required if you want your opinion to be taken seriously by other audiophiles, especially by audiophiles like us, the ones who know the importance of doing all of these things and more. (A small group, but a dedicated one to be sure.)
We encourage everyone who is serious about the sound quality of his records to follow our approach and do the kind of work we do. For us, in order to be sure that the records we offer are objectively superior to all others, we have to follow the strictest protocols and do everything according to the highest standards.
Like Consumer Reports, we design and follow protocols and set clear standards in our testing because that is what gives the tests we carry out credibility. Based on tens of thousands of hours of testing, we are convinced that no other approach can possibly work.
If you’re looking for the best sounding pressings, either we can do this kind of work for you, or you can do the work for yourself, but either way, in order to be successful the work we describe has to be done.
Pretending that one opinion has just as much validity as any other is the most obvious kind of motivated reasoning, born out of pure laziness. It doesn’t get you off the hook.
In fact, by giving you a license to be lazy, it insures that you will never get very far in this hobby. Examples of poorly-constructed comparisons of multiple pressings, carried out by audiophiles with woefully underdeveloped critical listening skills, have never been in short supply.
Because audio is hard. So is finding good sounding records. Very hard. Anyone who thinks otherwise is likely not finding very good sounding records.
Robert Brook is showing everyone the way. He’s on the right path. I happen to be very familiar with the path he’s on because I myself have been on that same path for a more than 20 years.
Read his stuff and learn from it. Do the work he’s doing and you will benefit from the huge improvements he’s achieved, with the promise of many more to come.
Musical thrills far beyond any that you might get from Heavy Vinyl await you.
Further Reading