More of the Music of Carole King
Letters, Reviews and Commentaries for Tapestry
One of our good customers had this to say about his recent experience on the Steve Hoffman forum.
We’ve added some headings and such like. Scroll down to read the many comments that have been left, most of which I have replied to at length.
Hi Tom,
When Fred emailed me to say that a copy of Tapestry was about to hit the site, I did not hesitate in buying it. I’m not writing today with one of my usual raves of your records. Suffice it to say, it’s always a joy to be hear an album I thought I knew by heart in a whole new way. Rather I’m writing because I still can’t fully square my enthusiasm for your records with the reaction I got when I talked about it on the Steve Hoffman Forum a couple months ago.
Hoffman’s Parting Words
As I purchased my 32nd (!) record from you without a moment’s hesitation, Steve Hoffman’s parting words to me sprang back into my mind. Could he possibly be right? Am I really paying for nothing when I buy a hot stamper? By posting my appreciation of Better Records on his forum, was I merely inducing other people to throw their money away too? Have I been fooling myself? Are there other ways to get records that sound as good as yours?
I never had a chance to respond to his view there because the whole thread was taken down a few minutes after he posted that, so if you don’t mind, I’d like to ask you to share my views with the readers of your blog, since people can’t find my views on the Steve Hoffman forum.
So here goes.
We’re all aware that there’s misinformation on the internet. We’ve learned by now how to spot the sins of commission – the obvious manipulations and falsehoods. What’s more pernicious are the sins of omission – accurate information that’s been removed because it does not fit a narrative.
Somebody interested in finding great sounding records would be blameless if they ended up with a pile of mediocrities, because they followed the advice and opinions readily available on the internet. It’s a frustration that there are so few voices like yours and Robert Brook’s offering a different view.
The biggest problem with a stack of mediocre records that you mistakenly believe are excellent is that if you ever notice they don’t sound very good, the only fix you can think of is to buy more expensive equipment.
And that’s where the real money gets wasted.
[Hear hear!]
A Roadmap for Finding “Pretty Good Records”?
There are tons of posts on the Steve Hoffman Forum, and tons of people are presumably following the advice there, but what’s on there is really nothing more than a roadmap to finding Pretty Good Records.
[Here I would have to say that many of the pressings recommended by the forum posters are not very good at all, since so many of them think Hoffman’s remasterings are the ultimate versions of those albums. They may sound pleasing to Hoffman and his acolytes, but it’s hard to believe they sound the way the artists, producers and engineers who created them wanted them to sound. Having played them up against scores of vintage pressings, made when the albums came out or shortly thereafter — which strikes me as the only legitimate evidence anyone can possibly offer to rebut his approach — we have to say we strongly disagree.]
Likewise, there are plenty of youtube reviewers and other influencers extolling the virtues of the latest pressing with the latest mastering from the original tapes. I really want people to understand that for the most part, these are also only Pretty Good Records. [At best.] There simply aren’t enough countervailing voices pointing this out, and now I know part of the reason why.
If you are getting your records any of these three ways, you are simply not getting consistently great sounding records:
1) Going on SHF and look up which deadwax inscriptions somebody swears by, and buying a copy on Discogs.
Yes, it’s certainly true that some deadwax inscriptions point the way toward the right mastering, the right pressing house, a day when the vinyl was just the right temperature, whatever it was. But, deadwax is not the whole story, and anybody who thinks a M- record with the right deadwax is the best sound they can possibly get is running a serious risk of only having a Pretty Good Record without even realizing it.
2) Going to your local shops and perusing the racks, looking for gems.
Realize that almost anything you buy anymore is going to be priced at Discogs rates. The best record shops I’ve found, like Jerry’s here in Pittsburgh, Atomic Records in LA, Bop Shop in Rochester, Stereo Jack’s in Boston, might price below Discogs rates, maybe charging the VG+ rate for a record that by appearances is NM, or tossing you a discount if you buy an armload. All record stores offer me anymore these days is the joy of the hunt. It’s a roll of the dice that your record will sound any better than Pretty Good once you get it home. And, if it doesn’t sound great to you, good luck trying to return it.
3) Buying new records.
There’s a huge industry telling you that today’s records are the best renditions of the classics. And, it makes perfect sense that they should be! Modern equipment, an accumulation of skills in mastering, thicker vinyl. What could possibly go wrong?
But for me, believing the industry telling me this was the greatest fallacy of all. If I could have back all the money I spent on new records from the audiophile houses and the equipment I bought trying to make them sound great, I’d spend it on a handful of Better Records, and be far happier for it. Sure, some sound Pretty Good. Most, I simply never listen to.
So, was Steve Hoffman right? Does his forum provide a way to get reliably great sounding records? Tom, are you and the company you started only inducing people to pay more money for the same product? The answers are simply no.
Avoiding the Mistakes I’ve Made