Labels With Shortcomings – Sundazed

Bob Dylan – Blonde on Blonde – Sundazed Mono Junk

More Bob Dylan

More Blonde on Blonde

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: D

Flat as a pancake and dead as a doornail, like most Sundazed records. Sundazed is clearly one of the worst record labels of all time. 

The Byrds in Mono – How Do They Sound?

byrdsmono_1145575910

None of the mono pressings of The Byrds’ albums that we’ve played in shootouts over the course of the last ten years or so has ever impressed us much, none that I can recall anyway.

Congested and compressed, with no real top, who in his right mind could possibly tolerate that kind of sound on modern equipment?

Although, to be fair, we’ve stopped buying them, so there may actually be a good copy or two out there in used record land that we haven’t heard. In our defense, who really has the time to play records with so little potential for good sound?

How about the Sundazed mono pressings?

The best Columbia stereo copies are rich, sweet and Tubey Magical — three areas in which the Sundazed reissues are seriously lacking.

Does anyone still care? We simply cannot be bothered with these bad Heavy Vinyl pressings. If you’re looking for mediocre sound just play the CD. I’m sure it’s just as terrible.

See all of our Byrds albums in stock

 

 

The Lovin’ Spoonful – Daydream on Sundazed Heavy Vinyl

More Lovin’ Spoonful

More Daydream

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: D

The best sounding of the Lovin’ Spoonful records I’ve heard on Sundazed, which means that the others would get an F for sound. Don’t waste your money. I’d be surprised if the CDs weren’t better sounding. (Many Sundazed CDs are actually quite good.) 

 

 

The Byrds – Fifth Dimension – More Dead as a Doornail Sundazed Sound

More The Byrds

More Fifth Dimension

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: D

The best stereo copies are rich, sweet and Tubey Magical — three areas in which the Sundazed reissues are seriously lacking. (If anyone still cares; we can’t be bothered with mediocrities such as this.) 

And none of the Columbia monos we’ve played did much for us either. Congested and compressed, with no real top, who in his right mind could possibly prefer that sound? (more…)

Spirit’s Third Album, Clear – Another Useless Sundazed Heavy Vinyl LP

More Spirit

More Clear

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: F

Hall of Shame and another Sundazed record debunked. 

Although it’s been many years since I last played it, I’m fairly confidant that the Sundazed only hints at the real sound of the best copies. Most Sundazed records would end up in our Hall of Shame if we ever bothered to audition them.

Being in the “record business,” such as it is, I’ve played my share and more of awful sounding Heavy Vinyl.

Even back in the (embarrassing) days when we were selling them we carried only about one out of ten that were in print. A big portion of the nine we didn’t stock were just awful as I recall. (more…)

The Lovin’ Spoonful – Do You Believe In Magic? on Sundazed Vinyl

More Lovin’ Spoonful

More Do You Believe In Magic?

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: F

More awful Sundazed mastering. Can the CD sound this flat and dead? I would bet money that it kills this piece of Heavy Vinyl trash.

 

 

Two Reviews of Blood, Sweat & Tears – Fremer Vs. Better Records – You Be the Judge

More Blood, Sweat & Tears

More Fremer Vs. Better Records — You Be the Judge

xxxxx

In 2010 MF reviewed both the Sundazed and Speakers Corner Heavy Vinyl pressings of the album. I think his review is mistaken on a number of counts, and mostly unhelpful. The commentary below will discuss his errors in detail, in the hopes that you, dear reader, will not make the same mistakes yourself. 

He talks about his history with the album for a while, and then notes:

Anyway, the original “360 Sound” edition of this record sounds fantastic. It’s a high quality Columbia studio recording, with vivid harmonics, impressive transparency and dynamics, shimmering highs and tight extended bass. The soundstage is expansive and the images tightly presented. I’m not sure it can get much better than the original given how well-pressed Columbia records were in those days, especially if you have a clean original.

We, however, seem to hold precisely the opposite view. I quote from our review:

“Why did it take us so long [to do a Hot Stamper shootout]? Let me ask you this: have you ever played this album? The average copy of this record is a sonic MESS. Even the best copies have problems.”

We then go on to discuss in detail what most copies do wrong and what to listen for in order to find a copy that gets it right. (More on that later.) (more…)

Highway 61 Revisited – Not So Good on Sundazed in Mono

More Bob Dylan

More Highway 61 Revisited

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: D

Hall of Shame Pressing and another Sundazed record debunked.

I don’t think mono works for this album, so we never carried this pressing nor recommended it.

Here are some other records that we don’t think sound very good in MONO.

Here are some we think can sound amazing in MONO.

Bob Dylan – Another Side of Bob Dylan – Sundazed Mono Debunked

More Bob Dylan

More Another Side of Bob Dylan

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: D

Another bad Sundazed record. Most of the Dylan catalog they did is just awful, regardless of what the reviewers at the time of their release may have written to the contrary. 

Albert King – Born Under a Bad Sign on Mediocre Sundazed Vinyl

More Albert King

More Born Under a Bad Sign

xxxxx

Sonic Grade: C

Commenting about the first Hot Stamper pressing of this album ever to come our way, we noted:

This original Stax LP has AMAZING sound. You could not make this record sound any better. We really liked the Sundazed copy of this record until we heard this bad boy. It MURDERS their pressing! It has far more life, energy and presence than the Heavy Vinyl pressing. We always suspected that a good original would be better but we had no way of knowing since all the copies we saw were beat to death.