Hot Stamper Pressings of the Music of Thelonious Monk Available Now
The Riverside 9242 pressing of Monk’s Music we played recently was very much not to our liking.
In fact, every copy of this record we have ever played sounded terrible. The early pressings sounded bad and the OJC sounded bad.
We give up. We’re cutting our losses. We love Monk, but why on earth would we keep throwing money down this rathole? Our notes for this copy read:
- Dry (more records with dry sound can be found here), and
- Bright (more records with bright sound can be found here),
- Overall grade: No Good
Some reviewers of the audiophile persuasion prefer to review only records that sound good to them and ignore the rest. We think this does the audiophile community a disservice.
Like Consumer Reports, we like to test things. They test toasters, we test records. We put them through their paces and let the chips fall where they may.
They want to find out if the things they are testing offer the consumer good quality and value.
We want to find out if the records we are testing offer the audiophile good sound and music.
It takes a dedicated group of people and a healthy budget to carry out these kinds of tests in large numbers.
No other record dealers, record reviewers or record collectors could possibly have auditioned more than a small fraction of the records that we’ve played. We’ve been looking for the best sounding pressings of the recordings that have stood the test of time for decades. Now, with a staff of ten or more, we can buy, clean and play records at a scale that would be unimaginable for any single person to attempt.
That puts us in a unique position to help audiophiles looking for the highest quality pressings.
Yes, we have the resources, the staff and the budget. More importantly, we came up with a much scientifically reliable approach.
We’ve learned through thousands and thousands of hours of experimentation that there is no reliable way to predict which pressings will have the best sound for any given album.
The impossibility of predicting the sound of records is one which we learned to accept as axiomatic. As a born skeptic, this was never difficult for me. Early on in my audio career, sometime in the ’80s, I realized it was self-evident.
The solution we put into practice given the chaotic nature of records mainly comprised these four elements:
- We stopped pretending to know something that can’t be known.
- We stopped relying on theories proven to have virtually no predictive effect.
- We stopped relying on the experts and so-called authorities.
- We stopped assuming and speculating and, importantly, we stopped worrying about getting it wrong.
What remained was the simplest approach to any problem ever devised. One that could be taught in a high school science class, if high school science classes were run for the benefit of skeptical record collectors.
- Guess what pressings might be good for a given album and buy some of those pressings.
- Clean them up, play them and see if your guess about the sound of the pressing turns out to be less true or more true.
- Repeat steps one through three until you find a pressing that sounds better than all the others.
- Get hold of as many of those as you can and play them against each other in a shootout.
- Continue to make other guesses and buy other pressings to play against the pressing you believe to be the best.
- Keep making improvements to your playback system and never stop testing as many records as possible.
That’s it. Nothing to it. It all comes down to experimenting at scale.
Edison is said to have failed 10,000 times before inventing a light bulb that was suitable.
Most audiophiles do not have the time and money, not to say patience, needed to fail again and again this way.
For us, having a full-time staff of ten and a rather large record buying budget, failures are just part of the job. Our successes pay for them, which is why our prices are as high as they are.
We don’t make a dime from writing about records that don’t sound good to us. We review them as a service to the audiophile community. We buy them and play them so that you can learn from our mistakes.
Further Reading
That’s a shame. “Monk’s Music” is my favorite Monk album. I know that it was recorded simultaneously in stereo and mono with different microphones placed in different parts of the studio, so the mono and stereo mixes sound very different from one another. Maybe the late 70s Gateway reissues are worth a try?
Jonathan,
I think we are done with it, but if you want to give some pressings a try, feel free and be sure to let us know what you find.
TP