More Entries in Our Thinking About Records Series
The idea of Hot Stamper pressings make more sense once you have a better understanding of statistical distributions.
Why statistics you ask?
Simple. We can’t tell what a record is going to sound like until we play it.
For all practical purposes, we are buying them randomly and “measuring” them to see where they fall on a curve.
We may be measuring them using a turntable and registering the data aurally, but it’s still very much measurement and it’s still very much data that we are recording (admittedly with a healthy amount of interpretation of the data involved, but that’s what we get paid to do, right?).
Many of these ideas were addressed in the shootout we did many years ago for BS&T’s second album. We played a large number of copies (the data), we found a few amazing ones (the outliers), and we tried to determine how many copies it really takes to find those records that sound so amazing they defy not only conventional wisdom, but our understanding of the recording itself.
We don’t know what causes some copies to sound so good.
(Here are some recent examples of shockingly good sounding pressings we discovered while doing shootouts.)
We know them when we hear them and that’s pretty much all we can say we really know. Everything else is speculation and guesswork.
We have data. What we don’t have is a theory that explains that data.
And it simply won’t do to ignore the data because we can’t explain it. Hot Stamper deniers are those members of the audiophile community who, when faced with something they don’t want to be true, simply manufacture reasons why it can’t be true or shouldn’t be true. That’s not science. It’s the very opposite of science.
Practicing science means following the data wherever it leads.
The truth can only be found in the record’s grooves and nowhere else.
If you don’t understand record collecting as a science, you won’t be able to do it well and you certainly won’t achieve the success that’s possible by using a scientific approach.