More of the music of Igor Stravinsky (1882-1971)
Reviews and Commentaries for the Music of Stravinsky
We used to think this was one of the better Speakers Corner Deccas.
Having recently played the London pressing of the same performance, cut by Decca of course, we think we are almost certainly wrong about the quality of the sound, but who knows? Maybe Speakers Corner remastered the record properly and fixed its shortcomings.
Hah, just joking. In our experience that has never happened and we think it is very unlikely that it ever will.
Years ago we wrote the following:
Wow! What a performance! What dynamic full bodied sound! To be fair, I pulled out my original London, one of those awful mid-’70s English pressings that are never quiet, and yes, some of the ambience on the original is missing here on the new version, but everything else seems right: dynamics, tonality, the frequency extremes (including some pretty awesome deep bass).
Some of the above could be right, the parts about the tonality and such. Speakers Corner could have added some bass and lower midrange to make the sound less thin, and taken out some of the upper midrange to make the loud passages less blary, but it certainly doesn’t solve the most serious issues we had with the recording, which is the fact that it is opaque and flat, two qualities that are the death of orchestral music on vinyl.
Here are the notes we made for the London.
The two paragraphs you see reproduced below are also full of bad advice we had given out in the past:
1. Can’t be sure we would still feel that way but I’m guessing this is a good record if you can pick one up at a cheap price.
2. If you have a quiet original, great, consider yourself lucky. As few of you have any copy at all, I recommend this one. The alternative is to miss Solti’s energetic performance and the precision of the Chicago Symphony, one of the few orchestras capable of making sense out of this complex and infuriating work. (At least it used to infuriate audiences. Now our modern ears can take a difficult work like this and appreciate the complex rhythms and atonality as the expression of a truly original mind.
This paragraph we would still agree with wholeheartedly:
This is not music to play while you are having dinner. This is music to engage the mind fully. It belongs in any collection. Yours in fact. Unless you have small speakers, in which case you would be wasting your money, as small speakers cannot begin to reproduce the power of this work in the hands of Solti and the CSO [or anybody else for that matter].
More music conducted by Georg Solti
Reviews and Commentaries for the Recordings of Kenneth Wilkinson
Best Orchestral Performances with Top Quality Sound
Well Recorded Classical Albums from The Core Collection Available Now
Tom, now that my gear is getting up to snuff, I’m excited, intrigued, and intimidated by the prospect of starting to tweak everything. Please tell me what I should be listening for / what the payoffs are. I imagine the soundstange gets larger and more distinct. Maybe more forward in the room? I imagine that things clear up a little, as secondary (and tertiary) reflections are reduced. (I’m in a very small room with very large speakers now…) I can’t imagine that tonal accuracy changes that much – that’s got to come down to the electronics and the drivers, right? So, what should I be listening for, and how will I know when I get there?
Aaron, we make it easy for you to make progress. Just play all the records linked under TEST RECORDS at the top of the blog and listen for the qualities and problems we discuss. With only a few years of dedicated effort you will surely have made a great deal of progress!
TEST RECORDS
Records that Are Good for Testing Ambience, Size and Space
Records that Are Good for Testing Bass and Whomp
Records that Are Good for Testing Bass Definition
Records that Are Good for Testing Big, Clear and Lively Choruses
Records that Are Good for Testing Compression
Records that Are Good for Testing Energy
Records that Are Good for Testing Grit and Grain
Records that Are Good for Testing in General
Records that Are Good for Testing Midrange Congestion
Records that Are Good for Testing Midrange Presence
Records that Are Good for Testing Midrange Tonality
Records that Are Good for Testing Richness and Smoothness
Records that Are Good for Testing Sibilance (It’s a Bitch)
Records that Are Good for Testing Side to Side Differences
Records that Are Good for Testing Smear
Records that Are Good for Testing Speed
Records that Are Good for Testing String Tone and Texture
Records that Are Good for Testing the Lower Midrange and Mid-Bass
Records that Are Good for Testing Transparency
Records that Are Good for Testing Treble Issues
Records that Are Good for Testing Tubey Magic
Records that Are Good for Testing Tubey Magical Acoustic Guitars
Records that Are Good for Testing Upper Midrange Shrillness
Difficult to Reproduce Recordings