More of the Music of Judy Collins
And there’s not much you can do about it.
Both Sides Now, the Top Ten hit that finally put Judy on the map, is clearly made from a copy tape and doesn’t sound as good as the songs that follow it on side two. Hey, it happens, and I suspect it happens more often than most audiophiles think. I would wager that back in the day most people who bought this album never even noticed.
One thing I’ve noticed about audiophiles over the years is that they’re pretty much like most people.
The difference of course is that they call themselves audiophiles, and audiophiles are supposed to care about sound quality.
They may care about it, but are they capable of evaluating high quality sound? What is the evidence for the affirmative in this proposition?
Are they actually capable of critical listening?
Do they listen critically enough to notice a dubby track on an otherwise good sounding record when they hear it?
Or dubby sound in general?
Or to notice that one side of a record often sounds very different from another?
Or that some reissues sound better than the originals of the album?
Or that there is no reliable correlation between the country that a rock band comes from and the country that made the best sounding pressings of their albums?
Evidence in the Negative
The embrace of one third-rate Heavy Vinyl pressing after another by the audiophile community has rendered absurd the pretense that their members ever developed anything beyond the most rudimentary critical listening skills.
Sadly, the Dunning-Kruger effect, the best explanation for the sorry state of audio these days, means they simply don’t know how little they know and therefore see no reason to doubt their high opinions of themselves, their equipment and their acumen.
Progress in audio is possible, but it helps to know that you are not already at the top of the mountain. The first thing you need to do is to appreciate just how much serious climbing is left to do.
Further Reading
This album sounds best to us this way: