This listing, like the stereo itself (mine and yours), is a work in progress. Please check back for the commentary we expect to be adding in the future.
Our reason for having this kind of commentary on a site ostensibly devoted to the selling of records is simple: the better your stereo sounds, the better our records sound, and, more importantly, the bigger the difference between our records and the copies you already own. Also those LPs recommended by “audiophile” record dealers, which tend to be on Heavy Vinyl, at 45 RPM, half-speed mastered or, even worse, Japanese pressed. We have no interest in any of them. Why? On our system they rarely sound better than second-rate.
Better Sound For You
Some of our favorite Sound Improving Devices are pictured to the left as well, products that can make a HUGE difference in the sound of your stereo, all of which are guaranteed to satisfy.
We will be adding new commentaries to this left hand column regularly, so check back to see what new and exciting discoveries we’ve made as we go about doing our Hot Stamper shootouts.
Our VPI Aries (original, not the latest model) with Super Platter / tweaked out VPI Synchronous Drive System (sitting on Stillpoints) / Triplanar Tonearm / Dynavector 17d3 / Aurios(which sit on a Townshend Seismic Sink) / EAR 324P (sitting on a Magic Pillow) and the scores of hours we’ve spent setting up and tweaking this beast is at the heart of everything we do around here.
Mix in extensive room treatments, aided in no small measure by three pairs of Hallographs, twenty five years of experience and endless hours of experimentation and you have a system that can separate the winners from the losers like nobody’s business.
Exactly like nobody’s business, because nobody does it in this business but us!
We love our modified Legacy Focus speakers, even more now that they have much improved high frequency extension courtesy of Townshend Super Tweeters. Our preamp and amp are vintage and low power; the Focus can play quite loudly with the thirty watts our amp puts out. We are big fans of Low Power (but not single ended) and are not the least bit happy with the current trend toward high-power amps, whether tube or transistor. (This trend started in the early ’70s with the Phase Linear 400 amp and has only gotten more out of hand with each passing year.)
We tried higher power amps to do the shootouts for Nirvana, AC/DC and their ilk but gave up fairly quickly. Using those amps involves major trade-offs; trade-offs whose costs rarely exceed their benefits. With more power comes less Tubey Magic, sweeteness, transparency, three-dimensionality and that wonderful relaxed quality which gives the music its flow and sense of ease.
High power amps do none of these things well, but most speakers today are terribly inefficient and require their use, a choice most audiophiles do not even know they are making when they buy them. I made that mistake myself many years ago. Live and learn.
Most of our wiring — interconnect, phono and power cord — is custom, although we recommend certain power cords when you buy specific equipment from us (such as the EAR phono stages and the VPI SDS).
And Why You Shouldn’t Care
Having said that, this commentary is all about why you shouldn’t care a whit about the equipment we use. http://www.better-records.com/product.aspx?pf_id=stereo
Prelude Step 4
According to the folks at Walker, “Prelude Step 4 is a special rinse that gets down deeper into the grooves and removes any remaining contaminates.”
We, however, had mixed results. Some LPs got better (more transparent, spacious) while others got worse (squaky, pinched, veiled). Since it is quite easy to remove the final rinse stage simply by rinsing the record again with Step 3, ata this point we are inclined to let the listener make his own judgments as to the benefits of Prelude Step 4 High Resolution Rinse.
We note that threads on various Audiophile Forums have almost unanimously favorable postings regarding the improvements in sound to be had with Step 4, but anyone familiar with our general philosophy and approach to audio will know that we put absolutely no stock in the opinions proffered in such postings. We don’t know these people, we don’t know what their stereos sound like, we don’t know what pressings they played on their stereos and we don’t know what they were listening for when they played them. That’s a lot of things not to know!
Do we reject them out of hand? Certainly not. We instead take them with a boulder-sized grain of salt and, if sufficiently motivated, proceed with our own listening tests under our own very carefully controlled conditions, playing records we know well on a stereo we listen to every day. Our results for Prelude Step 4 were mixed; your results may vary.
We use the Talisman not only on our records but on our cables and speaker drivers as well. (When you buy one from us drop us an email about our special tip to get the most out of the unit.)
Also, since 2007 we have been using Walker’s Enzyme Cleaning System for ALL our Hot Stamper shootout records. The difference is quite audible — less grit and grain, more transparency and extension on both ends. This is the same kind of positive effect the Disc Doctor has on records, but the Walker fluids somehow manage to give you even more of those wonderful qualities.
If you have a record you love and are willing to put in the extra elbow grease the Walker requires, the Enzyme Treatment cannot be overestimated.
Ch-Ch-Changes at Better Records
Over the course of the last decade things have changed dramatically for the better.
We’ve come up with a number of much more sophisticated and advanced cleaning techniques.
The ruler-flat, super-clean and clear Dynavector 17d replaced the more forgiving, less accurate 20x.
The EAR 324p we acquired at the beginning of 2007 was a BIG step up over the 834p in terms of resolution and freedom from distortion / coloration.
And the third pair of Hallographs had much the same effect, taking out the room distortions that compromise transparency and three-dimensionality.
With the implementation of a number of other seemingly insignificant tweaks, each of which made a subtle but recognizable improvement, the cumulative effect of all of the above was now clearly making a difference. The combination of so many improvements resulted in sound that was dramatically better in every way.
Reaching Back to 2005
These comments from the listing for Tea for the Tillerman from way back in 2005 discuss upgrades to your Front End.
These comments from the listing for Tea for the Tillerman from way back in 2005 discuss upgrades to your Front End.
Hard Headed Woman
This is a song that has evolved dramatically over the last 20 years. If you’ve been making regular upgrades to your equipment and taking advantage of all the new technologies available at the front end, such as:
vibration control, better arms, better cartridges, better phono stages, better motors, Synchronous Drive Systems, better power cords, better power conditioning, better platters,
to name just a few, you are no doubt able to reproduce this song much better than you were in the old days. I used to think that Cat’s voice got hard and harsh when he got loud on the passage that starts with “I know…many fine feathered friends…”. Now he gets even louder, the drums are much more powerful, and yet he still sounds like a real person, not an overdriven recording.
The Vinyl Stone Age
Modern front ends, properly tweaked and set up, can handle the kind of energy found on this song in a way that wasn’t possible before. I like to say that if your turntable is more than five years old and you haven’t done much to your front end since then, you are living in the vinyl stone age. There have been a number of revolutions in the area of LP playback, not the least of which is the Disc Doctor cleaning fluid we tout so obsessively, all of which have allowed us to reproduce familiar records in a startlingly realistic way never before possible.
A Good Record Is an Education
A good record is an education for me too. This is not only how I’ve managed to learn about the pressing in question; it’s the same process that allows me to make improvements in the sound of the stereo. It’s learning how to identify what is right and what is wrong with the sound of any pressing — the same process that helps me recognize whether any change to the stereo makes it sound better or worse, and to try and figure out by how much and in what way. And the best part is, like the practice of any skill, the more you do it, the better you get at it. I do it all day, every day. Not because I’m noble or dedicated. I do it because I enjoy it. It’s fun. It’s the most fun part of this job. Discovering great sounding recordings is a THRILL. It’s what this hobby is all about — hearing music sound better than you ever thought it could.
Change For The Better
Of course, as we’ve stated numerous times on the site, you learn almost nothing from the same record played back on the same equipment. What you must do is learn to listen for differences in the sound, and differences only come about as the result of a change. You have to CHANGE something in the system to develop these critical listening skills.
How about this example: the difference in sound between any two sides of a record. The only change there involves flipping the record over. No new equipment, no tweaks, no shootouts with dozens of alternate pressings. Just flip the record. Almost no record has the same sound on both sides, not the records we sell anyway. Where else have you ever read such a thing? Nowhere else, at least to my knowledge. Because not enough audiophiles and almost no record dealers make the effort to listen critically.
Training Your Ears
If you can’t hear the difference on at least some of your records, it has to be one or both of the following. Either your system is not good enough to resolve these differences, which is sometimes the case, or, much more likely, you simply haven’t trained your ears to listen for them. Not listening for pleasure. Listening like it’s a job. Critically. Analytically. Try to listen for one quality by itself. Listen for grain, or top end extension, or bass dynamics — anything, the list is endless. Focus in on that single quality, recognize it, appreciate it, then flip the record over and judge that quality for side two.
If you can’t hear the difference on at least some of your records, it has to be one or both of the following. either your system is not good enough to resolve these differences, which is sometimes the case, or, much more likely, you simply haven’t trained your ears to listen for them. not listening for pleasure. listening like it’s a job. critically. analytically. try to listen for one quality by itself. listen for grain, or top end extension, or bass dynamics — anything, the list is endless. focus in on that single quality, recognize it, appreciate it, then flip the record over and judge that quality for side two.
If you have a Music Hall turntable or an inexpensive Rega, or God forbid something older and cheaper, this may be asking too much. There is a minimum level of resolution your stereo must attain before these differences are discernable. With a cheap rig you certainly don’t need me to find records for you. Most of the records I praise highly present a severe test for your playback system, one that less sophisticated setups will have a hard time passing. Sergio Mendes’ records come readily to mind. You need to have one helluva well-setup, high quality front end before you can play them without sibilance and grain, let alone bring out all the magic. I don’t know a tougher test than Stillness, or Sergio Mendes & Brasil ‘66. They will bring most stereos to their knees, mine included if I haven’t tuned it right.
Better Vs. Not-Better
Much of the commentary on the site is there to explain how to differentiate the better pressings from the not-so-better pressings. The better the system, and the more careful the listener, the more these differences will matter. That’s why we charge so much money for the really hot copies – to us, they are worlds better than the runners up. They are right in a way that the typical Half-Speed or audiophile version almost never is. The more critically one listens, the more obvious this distinction becomes. The real thing just can’t be beat, and you can be pretty sure that the real thing is an old record.